After playing the crime solving games, add a comment telling me your name (first name and last initial) and answering the questions below. 1- How are the two games alike and different? 2- How realistic are the games in relation to what you have learned about crime solving? |
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
They are alike because they both are about solving a crime. They are different because one is about finding a toy and the other is about finding who moved the train.
ReplyDeleteWhat i have learned about crime solving is you have to keep track of what is going on because the criminal could change his corse at any time.
ReplyDeleteThey are alike because they both are about solving a crime , they are diddrent because one is about finding a dog toy and the other is about a gem being stolen.What I learned about crime soving is that a DNA test is when you take samples of an ojbict.
ReplyDeleteHi Amber and Cassie! The games sound fun. What about the other question? How realistic were they about crime solving?
ReplyDeleteThe games were like cartoons and they were not that realistic because the animals talked in the game.
ReplyDeleteAmber is right, and they were about things that could happen in real life.
ReplyDeleteThey both are alike because you had to use clues. They are different because CSI you had to find who stole a chew toy and the FFBI you had to find who stole the 500 dollar tickets.
ReplyDeleteThe CSI was real because you had to use footprints and hair as clues. The FFBI you had to talk to the criminals.
Jaylone, which game did you like best?
ReplyDeleteThe games are alike because they both are about solving crimes, They are differt because one is about a dog toy and the other you can chose witch one you want to do. They are realistic because you have to solve crimes.BRITTANY L
ReplyDelete